Exploring the Types of Model Railroad Track
Model railroading is a fascinating hobby that offers a blend of creativity, engineering, and nostalgia. A crucial aspect of creating a realistic and functional model railroad is choosing the right type of track. This article will delve into the different types of model railroad tracks for N, HO, O, and G scales, focusing on the distinctions between standard track and roadbed track, as well as the use of sectional track versus flex track. We'll also explore the pros and cons of each option, the concept of track code, and the possibility of combining different track brands within a layout.
Standard Track vs. Roadbed Track
Standard Track
- Description: Standard track consists of the rails and the ties, without any built-in roadbed.
- Usage: Commonly used by modelers who prefer to create their own roadbed and ballast, allowing for greater customization.
- Pros:
- Greater flexibility for custom layouts.
- More realistic appearance when custom roadbed and ballast are used.
- Often less expensive than roadbed track.
- Requires additional work to lay down roadbed and ballast.
- Can be more challenging for beginners.
Roadbed Track
- Description: Roadbed track
- includes an integrated roadbed, typically made of plastic or foam, which simulates the ballast and provides a built-in elevation.
- Brands: Popular brands like Kato (N scale) and Bachmanns E-Z Track (HO scale) offer roadbed track systems.
- Usage: Ideal for beginners or those who want a quick and easy setup with consistent performance.
- Pros:
- Easy to set up and adjust.
- Consistent height and alignment.
- Suitable for temporary and modular layouts.
- Cons:
- Limited in terms of customization.
- Generally, more expensive than standard track.
Sectional Track vs. Flex Track
Sectional Track
- Description: Sectional track comes in fixed lengths and curves with predefined radii. Pieces are designed to snap or connect together easily.
- Usage: Widely used in starter sets and for quick layout setups. Available in all scales.
- Pros:
- Easy to assemble and modify.
- Suitable for beginners and modular layouts.
- Ensures consistent and precise track geometry.
- Cons:
- Limited to fixed radii and lengths.
- Less flexibility in design.
- Can result in more joints, which might affect smoothness.
Flex Track
- Description: Flex track comes in long sections (usually 3 feet or more) that can be bent to any desired curvature. It requires cutting tools and a bit more skill to install.
- Usage: Preferred by advanced modelers for creating smooth curves and custom track layouts. Available in all scales, particularly popular in N and HO scales.
- Pros:
- Allows for custom curves and lengths.
- Fewer joints, leading to smoother operation.
- Greater flexibility in track design and layout.
- Cons:
- Requires more skill and tools to install.
- Can be more time-consuming to work with.
- Potentially higher initial cost per piece.
Understanding Track Code
What is Track Code?
- Definition: Track code refers to the height of the rail in thousandths of an inch. For example, Code 100 track has rails that are 0.100 inches tall.
- Usage: Different track codes are used to replicate different types of railroads and to scale the track proportionally to the model.
Common Track Codes by Scale
- N Scale: Common codes include Code 55 and Code 80. Code 55 is more realistic but can be more delicate, while Code 80 is sturdier and often used by beginners.
- HO Scale: Code 100 is the most robust and widely used, especially for beginners. Code 83 is popular for its more realistic appearance, while Code 70 and Code 55 are used for more detailed and prototypical layouts.
- O Scale: Code 148 and Code 125 are common, with Code 148 being the standard for most three-rail O scale layouts.
- G Scale: Track codes can vary more widely due to the outdoor use and durability requirements, with Code 332 being one of the more common choices. Bachmann also produces a non-standard tubular type of track, which is designed solely for indoor use and is not compatible with any standard tracks.
Using Different Track Codes Together
- Adapter Rail Joiners: These joiners are designed to connect rails of different heights seamlessly, ensuring smooth transitions between track sections of different codes.
- Transition Track Sections: Some manufacturers such as Atlas (N scale) and Wathers (HO Scale) produce special sections of track to connect varying codes of track.
- Custom Shimming: Shimming involves placing thin strips of material under the lower rail to bring its height up to match the taller rail. This method requires careful measurement and alignment.
- Purpose: Mixing track codes can enhance realism in your layout, allowing you to simulate different types of rail (e.g., mainline vs. branch line) and accommodate various rolling stock.
Pros and Cons of Different Track Codes
Higher Code (e.g., Code 100)
- Pros:
- Sturdier and more durable.
- Easier to handle and work with.
- Better suited for heavier and more frequent use.
- Cons:
- Less realistic appearance.
- May not scale accurately with finer models.
Lower Code (e.g., Code 83)
- Pros:
- More realistic and prototypical appearance.
- Better suited for detailed and realistic layouts.
- Cons:
- More delicate and can be harder to work with.
- Requires more careful handling and precise installation.
Combining Different Track Brands
Compatibility and Adaptation
- Connecting Different Brands: Different track brands often have slightly different rail joiners and connectors. Adapter joiners or custom modifications may be needed to ensure a secure and smooth connection. This is mostly true with respect to roadbed type track.
- Uniform Appearance: When mixing brands, ensure that the rail heights (codes) and tie spacing are consistent to maintain a uniform appearance and performance.
- Testing for Smooth Transitions: Before permanently fixing the track, test the connections by running a train over the joined sections to check for any bumps or misalignments.
Pros and Cons of Combining Brands
- Pros:
- Variety and Flexibility: Combining brands can provide access to a wider variety of track types, curves, and switches, enhancing layout possibilities.
- Cost Efficiency: Using different brands can help manage costs, as some brands may offer better prices on certain track pieces.
- Customization: Allows for more customization and creative solutions in layout design.
- Cons:
- Compatibility Issues: Different brands may not always fit together perfectly, requiring adjustments.
- Aesthetic Differences: Variations in tie color, spacing, and rail appearance can affect the overall look of the layout.
- Increased Complexity: Mixing brands can complicate the planning and construction process.
Conclusion
Choosing the right type of track for your model railroad is essential for creating a layout that is both functional and visually appealing. Standard track offers flexibility and cost savings, while roadbed track provides ease of use and consistency. Sectional track is perfect for beginners and quick setups, whereas flex track offers unparalleled customization for advanced modelers. Understanding and using different track codes can further enhance the realism and functionality of your layout. Combining different track brands can offer additional flexibility and variety but may require careful planning and adjustments.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your skill level, layout goals, and personal preferences. Whether you're just starting out or are a seasoned model railroader, understanding the differences between these track types, codes, and brands will help you build the perfect railway for your model trains. Happy railroading!
